Re: Re: trump shooting
By: Arelor to Kurisu on Thu Apr 30 2026 06:04 pm
> This is a typical socialist argument and the issue with it is socialist
> create those systems, force people to pay for them whether you want them or
> not, and if you complain they tell you not to use them.
Funny, you seem to be ignoring the point of the explicit hypocricy of people acc
epting some social programs without question, but decrying others. No one is tel
ling anyone not to use them - it's pointing out the double standard of wishing t
o use those programs for ones own benefit but deciding arbitrarily, seemingly on
ly due to sheer spite, that other programs and such just should not be.
If "socialism is bad" as oh so many who can't even begin to accurately define su
ch (while taking advtange of limited forms of it every single day) say, why then
take advantage of any such program? If one is bad, they are all bad, right?
Can't help but also notice the other examples of government managed services wer
e not addressed. Never are when brought up.
> Why would anybody not use them if they were already forced to buy them?
> (Hint hint we have people here waiting for a year for treatment from a
> socialized orthopedia unit).
Yes, because logistics problems are purely a socialist construct, never happens
with privatized systems. /s
_________
kurisu Yamato
www.xadara.com
---
■ Synchronet ■ Revertive Pulse - revertivepulse.net
|
