-=> Rastus wrote to Neoskai <=-
Ra> Neoskai wrote:
> Ok am i the one to think that ubuntu never went to Unity i was happy with
> GNOME and kind of miss the fun of messing with it as i tend to mess it up
> in 9.10
> i am one of them guys who thinks its ok but feels like mac osx or windows
> in a way but then this is me
> Wolfshark :3
Ra> I have tried to like Unity.. I really tried.. but just can't get into
Ra> it.. but it might be a nice choice for a tablet?? However, I like KDE
Ra> for my local desktop and xfce for remote desktops. I liked gnome 2 but
Ra> find gnome 3 a bit lack luster. I like where KDE is going.. with enough
Ra> machine it handles very well, it has a nice app package, and the eye
Ra> candy is great.
Ra> Now I'm running the kubuntu distro, but am toying with the idea of
Ra> switching to Arch when I add more ram and need to switch to 64 bit.
Personally, I'm partial to Xubuntu. I love the responsiveness and
simplicity. Very easy to configure, too. Right now I've got my
layout to match a Windows layout, with one bar on the bottom holding
the taskbar, time, systray etc, and the menu on the bottom left.
Running the Clearlooks scheme. I remember a while back they defaulted
the window buttons to the opposite side, and I had to manually
configure the Quit/Minimize/Maximize back to where they had always
been...not sure if they ever put those back, but I've always had those
configured to their "normal" position.
I'm just oldschool, I guess. I like my desktop simple and the way
I've been using it since 1995. 'course, in 1995 when I upgraded to
Windows 95, I figured out how to change my default shell to
progman.exe...lol... just takes me a long time to change with the
times... ;)
--- MultiMail/Linux v0.49
■ Synchronet ■ Southeast Texas Chat
|
