Re: bbs.smb_curmsg in messages to you
By: Nightfox to Digital Man on Sun May 12 2013 07:30 pm
> Re: bbs.smb_curmsg in messages to you
> By: Digital Man to Nightfox on Sun May 12 2013 13:44:16
>
> DM> What about the bbs.msg_number property? It behaving as you would
> DM> expect?
>
> I haven't tried using bbs.msg_number yet, but so far it seems to be
> behaving as I would expect. But I'm a little hesitant to use it for
> MsgBase.get_msg_header(), since it doesn't change when new messages are
> added or deleted. SlyEdit (currently) uses message indexes, since I've
> always thought that was the most reliable way to reference a message.
No, it's actually the opposite. Think of the message number like a "serial
number" for the message. It won't be reused and never expires.
> I
> remember a discussion a few months ago that I think involved using
> bbs.msg_number in a calculation to come up with an absolute message number,
> which wouldn't necessarily be for a message that exists.
That was an unrelated subject, but yes, there can be "wholes" in the message
numbers (where a message once existed but was deleted).
> Can
> bbs.msg_number be used directly in MsgBase.get_msg_header (with the
> by_offset parameter as false)?
Yes, exactly.
The bbs.msg_offset property will probably just be removed since it doesn't
provide any benefit.
digital man
Synchronet "Real Fact" #66:
SEXYZ is as a 32-bit replacement for [F]DSZ, CE-XYZ and other protocol drivers.
Norco, CA WX: 78.3°F, 38.0% humidity, 13 mph NNW wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrs
---
■ Synchronet ■ Vertrauen ■ Home of Synchronet ■ telnet://vert.synchro.net
|
