Door Games Unlimited

Welcome, Guest.


Subject: system.exec() vs. bbs.exec() for native command line program Date: Fri Oct 24 2014 17:14:40
From: Digital Man To: Nightfox

  Re: system.exec() vs. bbs.exec() for native command line program
  By: Nightfox to All on Sun Oct 19 2014 10:10 am

 > I know that one difference between system.exec() and bbs.exec() is that
 > bbs.exec() can run Baja modules and JavaScript scripts and system.exec() is
 > for running native programs, but it seems that bbs.exec() can run native
 > programs as well (also, the EX_NATIVE flag can be used with bbs.exec() to
 > specify that it's a native 32-bit application).  So if you need to run a
 > native program from a Synchronet JavaScript script, what's the difference
 > between using bbs.exec() and system.exec(), and does it matter which one
 > you use?

The 'system' object is available in all Synchronet JS environments (jsexec, 
servers, servces), while 'bbs' is only available in the Terminal Server (for 
telnet, Rlogin, SSH connections).

The bbs.exec() can be used to execute a native program with redirected 
input/output. system.exec() does not support redirected I/O.

If your script is intended for use in the terminal server, I would use 
bbs.exec().

                                            digital man

Synchronet "Real Fact" #43:
Synchronet added JavaScript suppport with v3.10a (2001).
Norco, CA WX: 83.7°F, 24.0% humidity, 7 mph SE wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrs

---
 ■ Synchronet ■ Vertrauen ■ Home of Synchronet ■ telnet://vert.synchro.net

Previous Message       Next Message
In Reply To: system.exec() vs. bbs.exec() for native command line program (Nightfox)
Replies: system.exec() vs. bbs.exec() for native command line program (Nightfox)