Just a restatement of what I had asked in IRC:
10:55 < khelair> msg_area.sub["mail"] is not a preferred method of accessing
what the last_msg or last_read pointer might be for the mail
sub, is it?
11:07 < khelair> would I be correct in assuming that the Mail sub, in the
standard shell, utilizes the applicable message header
attributes to glean where the unread ones are at?
though I misphrased it pretty poorly at the beginning. What I meant to say
was 'If msg_area.sub["mail"] is not a potential method of accessing the
last_msg or last_read pointers, then would I be correct in assuming that the
mail sub, in the standard shell, utilizes applicable message header attributes
to clean where the unread ones are at?
TIA
-D/K
---
Borg Burgers: We do it our way; your way is irrelevant.
■ Synchronet ■ Tinfoil Tetrahedron BBS telnet://tinfoil.synchro.net
|
