Hello echicken,
On 26 Nov 15 00:41, echicken wrote to Nightfox:
>> Would that break existing scripts that are currently managing them>
>> separately?What I think I'll do is leave scrollbar.js where it is,
>> and then have frame.jsload it. That way any script currently
>> loading scrollbar.js will still have itavailable. Frame will then
>> create ScrollBar instances if scrollbars aretoggled on, and maintain
>> them for you.Even if some script is already using scrollbar.js and
>> setting 'scrollbars' to'true' on a Frame, it probably won't break
>> anything. You'd just end up withtwo scrollbars, one layered over
>> the other, doing the same thing, with only thetopmost one
>> visible.---echicken electronic chicken bbs -
>> bbs.electronicchicken.com - 416-273-7230
ec> ===
ec> ■ Synchronet ■ electronic chicken bbs - bbs.electronicchicken.com
ec> --- SBBSecho 2.27-Linux
ec> * Origin: thePharcyde_ telnet://bbs.pharcyde.org (Wisconsin)
ec> (723:1/1)
Just an FYI, your replies are coming in here all mangled up. I think part of
what you posted is in the above quote, but some of it is NIghtfox's comments.
Regards,
Nick
--- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5-b20150715
* Origin: thePharcyde_ telnet://bbs.pharcyde.org (Wisconsin) (723:1/701)
■ Synchronet ■ thePharcyde_ telnet://bbs.pharcyde.org (Wisconsin)
|
