On 6/26/2009 4:24 PM, Jas Hud wrote:
>> That's fair, however, there's a bit of overhead to using Mozilla's XUL
>> application environment in and of itself, same as Firefox.
>
> btw as i read this thunderbird is eating up 33 megs of memory.
> thats a LOT of memory considering, now isnt it?
Well, opening firefox to my homepage takes up about 49mb... so by comparison
it isn't so bad, now is it? Since thunderbird re-uses the XUL application
framework, and impliments it's renderer, iirc, using the gecko engine. Same
as with Firefox. Also, compared to most heavy GUI applications, less than
100mb of memory isn't so bad... I have 2GB in my laptop, 8GB in my desktop...
why should I really worry about it so long as it is performant.
If you can suggest an email client, that works with multiple accounts as well,
and is as portable too different OSes as thunderbird is... I'd be willing to
take a look.
--
Michael J. Ryan - http://tracker1.info/
... FRA #109: Dignity and an empty sack is worth the sack.
---
■ Synchronet ■ Roughneck BBS - telnet://roughneckbbs.com - www.roughneckbbs.com
|
