> Re: God
> By: echicken to Atari X on Sun Jan 10 2010 04:01 pm
>
> > This doesn't clear anything up at all, and in fact completely ignores my
> > assertion that simply not proving that something exists does not prove
> > that does not exist. You've just repeated yourself. We are now going
> > around in circles. This discussion is quickly becoming anything but.
>
> See my Russel's teapot post. Can anyone prove the teapot DOESN'T exist? No?
> Well does that mean they should believe it then? Can anyone prove that the
> leprachaun living up my butt-hole DOESN'T exist? No? Better assume he does
> then. But I do agree, the convo can't really go much further.
>
Leprachaun!!!!!!
Horrible movie.
---
■ Synchronet ■ Vertrauen ■ Home of Synchronet ■ telnet://vert.synchro.net
|
