Re: Proving God?
By: echicken to Atari X on Wed Jan 13 2010 11:24 am
> Re: Proving God?
> By: Atari X to Curt on Wed Jan 13 2010 03:24:25
>
>
> > But a theoretical physicist doesn't just start with nothing and sets off
> > creating science from scratch. He starts from a firm grounding in the re
> > provable, observable universe. And, from there, he extrapolates on what
> > knows to be real and true, and starts formulating plausible ideas about w
> > the nature of the universe might be.
>
> And any number of experiments you could conduct to bear out your hypothesis
> that God does not exist would be absolutely valid, this is true. I would ho
> though, that a theoretical physicist would accept that even though they've
> proven something to the extent that they can with the information available
> them, that there is always room for new information, and that something migh
> come along and prove their theory wrong.
>
> I take no issue with well-proven theories being accepted as fact until
> something comes along, if ever, to disprove them. Without that, few if any
> the things in this world that we believe to be true could actually be counte
> upon to be so. However, just because nobody is looking for proof of certain
> things doesn't mean that the proof might not be out there.
>
> echicken
> electronic chicken bbs - bbs.electronicchicken.com - 416-273-7230
>
hmm, here is a idea, did anyone ask him if he excists?
Caput meum major podice meo.
This message has ended, go in peace...
---
■ Synchronet ■ Three Stooges Gentlemens Club - Las Vegas, Nv - tsgc.dyndns.org
|
