Re: Proving God?
By: Curt to Atari X on Wed Jan 13 2010 09:05 am
> Curt heard from Atari X about Proving God? on 01-13-10
>
> AX>The fundamental flaw in your argument is that you don't really understand
> AX>the scientific method works. Or, at least you aren't revealing that know
> AX>in your post.
>
> OK asshole, so it's OK to posit shit we can't see or have a prayer of EVER
> proving like extra dimensions. And I agree that it is OK. It's not repeatabl
> provable but it is somehow 'scientific' even though that defies the very
> defintion of what science as what is usually defined by idiots like yourself
>
> However, to posit that there is some autonomous intellegence in those dimens
> acting in some fasion to cause effect here is somehow not scientific and is
> frowned upon eventhough its the best explanation for what we see.
>
> That is bulllshit and all of your holier then thou replies won't change that
> And poeple are waking up to this.
>
People are waking up to believing in a Magic Grandpa who controls the universe
and will spank us if we don't do as he says?
No, there's no God, there's no proof of God, there can be no proof of God. God
exists on faith alone - in short, he doesn't exist. Trying to say that there's
any scientific validity for an omniscient superbeing responsible for the
creation of the universe is totally ludicrous.
God was created from whole cloth for the purpose of keeping the ignorant and
easily led in line with guilt and repression.
---
■ Synchronet ■ Diamond Mine Online BBS - bbs.dmine.net
|
